5  Interior Columbia Snake River Chinook steelhead

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Clark (1993) vitae ante quis dui egestas fringilla ac vitae justo (Ansley and Davis 1981; Collins et al. 1996; Deuel and Clark 1968) . Pellentesque quis magna vel odio malesuada rutrum a volutpat nisl. Aliquam fermentum, urna eget tristique mattis, augue augue tristique ipsum, eget finibus nunc eros non nisi. Phasellus mattis hendrerit sapien, quis accumsan dui pretium eget. Nunc eleifend laoreet urna a luctus. Nulla vel sapien in nulla gravida tempus sit amet a metus. Vivamus porta condimentum tempus. Maecenas rhoncus elit id ultricies scelerisque. In gravida urna in ligula fringilla euismod. Curabitur efficitur porta libero ac fermentum. Cras fringilla et libero at posuere. Curabitur sodales dapibus elit a convallis.

Morbi iaculis eget augue eget facilisis. Etiam non orci dignissim, efficitur purus viverra, pellentesque neque. Aliquam ornare, magna ut dictum mollis, nunc lorem iaculis nibh, eu consequat lectus urna euismod tortor. Etiam ut felis nisl. Nunc quis euismod felis. Vestibulum gravida nisi mi, quis mollis velit ullamcorper non. Aliquam tempus fringilla bibendum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce viverra nulla elementum libero mollis, quis cursus velit sagittis.

5.1 General location

Morbi iaculis eget augue eget facilisis. Etiam non orci dignissim, efficitur purus viverra, pellentesque neque. Aliquam ornare, magna ut dictum mollis, nunc lorem iaculis nibh, eu consequat lectus urna euismod tortor.

Figure 5.1: Interior Columbia Snake River Chinook steelhead. Map of the general location of the ESU.

5.2 Recent trends

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec vitae ante quis dui egestas fringilla ac vitae justo. Pellentesque quis magna vel odio malesuada rutrum a volutpat nisl. Aliquam fermentum, urna eget tristique mattis, augue augue tristique ipsum, eget finibus nunc eros non nisi. Phasellus mattis hendrerit sapien, quis accumsan dui pretium eget. Nunc eleifend laoreet urna a luctus. Nulla vel sapien in nulla gravida tempus sit amet a metus. Vivamus porta condimentum tempus. Maecenas rhoncus elit id ultricies scelerisque. In gravida urna in ligula fringilla euismod. Curabitur efficitur porta libero ac fermentum. Cras fringilla et libero at posuere. Curabitur sodales dapibus elit a convallis.

Morbi iaculis eget augue eget facilisis. Etiam non orci dignissim, efficitur purus viverra, pellentesque neque. Aliquam ornare, magna ut dictum mollis, nunc lorem iaculis nibh, eu consequat lectus urna euismod tortor. Etiam ut felis nisl. Nunc quis euismod felis. Vestibulum gravida nisi mi, quis mollis velit ullamcorper non. Aliquam tempus fringilla bibendum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce viverra nulla elementum libero mollis, quis cursus velit sagittis.

Figure 5.2: Interior Columbia Snake River Chinook steelhead. Log spawner count trends.

5.3 Population raw data

Morbi iaculis eget augue eget facilisis. Etiam non orci dignissim, efficitur purus viverra, pellentesque neque. Aliquam ornare, magna ut dictum mollis, nunc lorem iaculis nibh, eu consequat lectus urna euismod tortor. Etiam ut felis nisl. Nunc quis euismod felis. Vestibulum gravida nisi mi, quis mollis velit ullamcorper non. Aliquam tempus fringilla bibendum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce viverra nulla elementum libero mollis, quis cursus velit sagittis.

5.3.1 Asotin Ck.

Table 5.1: Spawners and fracwild from Asotin Ck. (NMFS_POPID 300) for 2000 to 2018.

Year	Spawners	Fracwild
2000	431	0.89
2001	844	0.90
2002	740	0.90
2003	766	0.90
2004	707	0.90
2005	779	0.94
2006	696	0.92
2007	371	0.83
2008	328	0.94
2009	375	0.97
2010	1,418	1.00
2011	1,132	1.00
2012	930	0.98
2013	540	1.00
2014	542	0.98
2015	841	1.00
2016	583	1.00
2017	316	0.99
2018	169	0.99
** data file: ICSRsthd.csv mod date: Wed Aug 10 17:57:25 2022 -0600
* These spawner counts are from river redd surveys.
flextable

5.3.2 Joseph Ck.

Table 5.2: Spawners and fracwild from Joseph Ck. (NMFS_POPID 310) for 2000 to 2017.

Year	Spawners	Fracwild
2000	2,020	1.00
2001	2,596	1.00
2002	4,752	1.00
2003	2,381	1.00
2004	1,756	1.00
2005	1,832	1.00
2006	1,428	1.00
2007	1,212	1.00
2008	2,322	1.00
2009	3,598	1.00
2010	1,831	1.00
2011	5,810	0.97
2012	1,357	0.96
2013	2,197	0.98
2014	2,720	0.97
2015	2,969	0.98
2016	1,663	0.96
2017	1,610	0.97
** data file: ICSRsthd.csv mod date: Wed Aug 10 17:57:25 2022 -0600
* These spawner counts are from river redd surveys.
flextable

5.3.3 Grande Ronde R. Up. Mainstem

Table 5.3: Spawners and fracwild from Grande Ronde R. Up. Mainstem (NMFS_POPID 306) for 2000 to 2018.

Year	Spawners	Fracwild
2000	1,084	0.76
2001	1,898	0.89
2002	1,581	0.92
2003	1,581	1.00
2004	678	0.99
2005	1,310	0.99
2006	949	0.99
2007	806	1.00
2008	2,096	1.00
2009	3,148	1.00
2010	2,876	0.95
2011	3,275	1.00
2012	3,260	1.00
2013	1,553	0.99
2014	2,512	1.00
2015	4,939	0.99
2016	2,572	0.99
2017	1,733	0.98
2018	341	1.00
** data file: ICSRsthd.csv mod date: Wed Aug 10 17:57:25 2022 -0600
* These spawner counts are from river redd surveys.
flextable

Ansley, H. L. H., and C. D. Davis. 1981. “Migration and Standing Stock of Fishes Associated with Artificial and Natural Reefs on Georgia’s Outer Continental Shelf.” Brunswick, Georgia, USA.

Clark, W. G. 1993. “The Effect of Recruitment Variability on the Choice of a Target Level of Spawning Biomass Per Recruit.” In, 233246. Alaska Sea Grant College Program AKSG9302.

Collins, M. R., S. B. Van Sant, D. J. Schmidt, and G. R. Sedberry. 1996. “Age Validation, Movements, and Growth Rates of Tagged Gag (Mycteroperca Microlepis), Black Sea Bass (Centropristis Striata) and Red Porgy (Pagrus Pagrus).” In, edited by F. Arrequin-Sanchez, J. L. Munro, M. C. Balgos, and D. Pauly, 161–65. Makati City, Philippines: ICLARM (International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management).

Deuel, D. G., and J. R. Clark. 1968. “The 1965 Salt-Water Angling Survey.”